Historical Open At Date
Helps you identify potential bottlenecks, track progress over time, and make data-driven decisions to improve your development process.
Get a powerful, holistic view of your team's workflow and effectiveness in managing the backlog
with the
Historical Open At Date
Helps you identify potential bottlenecks, track progress over time, and make data-driven decisions to improve your development process.

From startups to large enterprises, Keypup serves all the unique complexities related to project size, structure and teams, including:
Monitoring the Open at Date (for both Issues and Pull Requests) alongside the cumulative count of created/reopened and closed/merged events provides a powerful, holistic view of your team's workflow and effectiveness in managing their backlog.
This combination allows you to understand not only how many things are being created and resolved, but also how long they are staying open.
- For Issues: Tracking the Open at Date allows you to visualize the aging of your bug backlog and identify potential bottlenecks in issue resolution. Combined with the cumulative flow of created, reopened, and closed issues, you can quickly see if old issues are piling up, if new issues are being addressed promptly, and how effectively reopened issues are being handled. This allows you to identify potential problems in your development process, such as a lack of resources for bug fixing, complex issues that are difficult to resolve, or a need for better prioritization. It helps answer questions like: "Are we letting old bugs linger for too long?", "Are we creating more issues than we can close?", and "Are reopened issues being addressed with the appropriate urgency?"
- For Pull Requests: Monitoring the Open at Date of PRs shows how long code changes are waiting to be merged. Coupled with the cumulative count of opened, reopened, and merged PRs, it reveals the overall velocity of code integration. You can identify PRs that have been open for an extended period, indicating potential review bottlenecks, merge conflicts, or other issues preventing them from being integrated. It helps answer questions like: "Are PRs getting stuck in review for too long?", "Are we merging code quickly enough to keep up with the pace of development?", and "Are there specific areas of the codebase that consistently have longer PR open times?"